Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validating reconstructors against reference implementations #254

Open
2 of 17 tasks
sdmccabe opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Open
2 of 17 tasks

Validating reconstructors against reference implementations #254

sdmccabe opened this issue Oct 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sdmccabe
Copy link
Collaborator

sdmccabe commented Oct 9, 2019

Same as #245 but for the reconstructors. My suspicion is that most of these don't have easily comparable reference implementations, so those can be checked off fairly quickly. The implementers of each method probably did some checks for reference implementations so we should reach out to them.

  • Convergent Cross Mapping
  • Correlation Matrix
  • Correlation Spanning Tree
  • Free Energy Minimization
  • Graphical Lasso
  • Marchenko Pastur
  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation
  • Mean Field
  • Mutual Information Matrix
  • Naive Transfer Entropy
  • Optimal Causation Entropy
  • OU Inference
  • Partial Correlation Influence
  • Partial Correlation Matrix
  • Random
  • Thouless Anderson Palmer
  • Time Granger Causality
@leotrs
Copy link
Collaborator

leotrs commented Oct 9, 2019

It'd be nice (if at all possible) to have a single script/notebook to run once we have identified reference implementations.

@sdmccabe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sdmccabe commented Oct 9, 2019

I was thinking about something similar; the challenge of course is that not all the reference implementations are in Python. I guess for R-based implementations we can still use Jupyter, but what about Matlab or C++? Another possibility would be another repository containing the validation scripts.

@leotrs
Copy link
Collaborator

leotrs commented Oct 9, 2019

Uuuuuuh let's not do another repo...

@sdmccabe sdmccabe added this to the 1.0 milestone Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants