Prefix utilization is 0% when the container prefix and active prefix are same #5834
Unanswered
nextgenkitty
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Do you have See: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/ipam/models.py#L597-L615 I guess you could try extending the query:
so that it also matches any prefix with the same prefix/vrf and |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As a sample, I have a Container prefix with 10.200.0.0/24 and created the same 10.200.0.0/24 prefix with status Active.
I expect the container utilization to be 100% but it's showing 0%. This logic doesn't make sense to me because I allocate a container as a supernet and I just happen to use the full subnet as active on a production device, which is a legitimate logic. Can we change this behavior? Or am I not using the IPAM correctly? What else can I do then?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions