You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Nice job! I noticed that you have additionally provided the checkpoints to support the resolutio of 1288x1288.
However, I would like to know if there is a way to support HMR at arbitrary sizes? And if we adjust the image size in ImageOps.contain and keep the aspect ratio, predict the SMPL-X parameters, and then scale back to the original image size, will these operations affect the accuracy of SMPLX["transl"]? How can we address the above two issues when dealing with dataset like WAYMO(image size=1920x1280).
Looking forward to your reply.
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @sylcito
Thanks for you interest in our work.
At the moment we do not support arbitrary size unfortunately. I would recommend to adjust the image size, keeping the same aspect ratio and zero padding. The 'transl' will not be affected. You only need to adjust the focal length when rendering at higher resolution. You should compute the field of view then compute the focal length for the resolution 1288x1288 and then compute for your desired resolution (1920x1280). I hope that it is clear enough.
Good luck for your research,
Hi,
Nice job! I noticed that you have additionally provided the checkpoints to support the resolutio of 1288x1288.
However, I would like to know if there is a way to support HMR at arbitrary sizes? And if we adjust the image size in
ImageOps.contain
and keep the aspect ratio, predict the SMPL-X parameters, and then scale back to the original image size, will these operations affect the accuracy of SMPLX["transl"]? How can we address the above two issues when dealing with dataset like WAYMO(image size=1920x1280).Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: