We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ssb-ebt 5.6.7
solar throws an error because the EBT replicate request from Patchwork does not contain the format field, as expected.
format
[2024-01-31T08:49:19Z TRACE muxrpc-ebt-handler] Received MUXRPC input: Network(4, RpcRequest(Body { name: ["ebt", "replicate"], rpc_type: Duplex, args: Array [Object {"version": Number(3)}] })) [2024-01-31T08:49:19Z TRACE ebt-replication] Session error with HEqy940T6uB+T+d9Jaa58aNfRzLx9eRWqkZljBmnkmk=.ed25519 for request number None: Serde JSON error: missing field `format`
This is not a problem with solar, but I wanted to flag it here anyway. EBT replication seems to be working just fine when solar acts as the requester.
CC: @black-puppydog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So patchwork isn't spec compliant?! Color me unsurprised 😆
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think the format field must have been introduced in a later version. The ssb-ebt version being used by Patchwork is quite old.
ssb-ebt
No branches or pull requests
solar throws an error because the EBT replicate request from Patchwork does not contain the
format
field, as expected.This is not a problem with solar, but I wanted to flag it here anyway. EBT replication seems to be working just fine when solar acts as the requester.
CC: @black-puppydog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: