Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EBT fails with Patchwork-3.18.1 (ssb-ebt 5.6.7) when solar acts as responder #90

Open
mycognosist opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mycognosist
Copy link
Owner

mycognosist commented Jan 31, 2024

solar throws an error because the EBT replicate request from Patchwork does not contain the format field, as expected.

[2024-01-31T08:49:19Z TRACE muxrpc-ebt-handler] Received MUXRPC input: Network(4, RpcRequest(Body { name: ["ebt", "replicate"], rpc_type: Duplex, args: Array [Object {"version": Number(3)}] }))
[2024-01-31T08:49:19Z TRACE ebt-replication] Session error with HEqy940T6uB+T+d9Jaa58aNfRzLx9eRWqkZljBmnkmk=.ed25519 for request number None: Serde JSON error: missing field `format`

This is not a problem with solar, but I wanted to flag it here anyway. EBT replication seems to be working just fine when solar acts as the requester.

CC: @black-puppydog

@black-puppydog
Copy link

So patchwork isn't spec compliant?! Color me unsurprised 😆

@mycognosist
Copy link
Owner Author

I think the format field must have been introduced in a later version. The ssb-ebt version being used by Patchwork is quite old.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants