Replies: 2 comments
-
Good catch. I know at least some other projects don't consider this a problem, but we'll look into it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I talked to Thomas of Nordic Semiconductor about this and he also does not consider it a problem. These are header files we place there for CI building convenience to support different softdevices woithout needing to patch the toolchain. They're usually part of the nordic nRF5 sdk/nrfxlib which we link to anyway. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This project contains both code under GPL 3.0 and code under Nordic 5-Clause.
GPL 3.0 states:
firmware/LICENSE
Lines 210 to 212 in 10869ea
firmware/LICENSE
Lines 222 to 228 in 10869ea
and
firmware/LICENSE
Lines 388 to 396 in 10869ea
and
firmware/LICENSE
Lines 463 to 469 in 10869ea
Nordic 5-Clause states:
firmware/src/platform/nrf52/softdevice/ble.h
Lines 21 to 25 in 10869ea
To me these terms seem incompatible, meaning that nobody but Meshtastic LLC (the sole copyright holder due to the CLA) is allowed to legally distribute the Meshtastic firmware for nrf52 boards. Am I missing something?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions