Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proposal for an application service management API #3807

Open
turt2live opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Proposal for an application service management API #3807

turt2live opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
application services kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Comments

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

turt2live commented Jun 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Documentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y6bWdejrOiwL5UjnJ5VnOKoK6OfK6kX-pYbWT7f5czA/edit
Room: #MSC1309:t2bot.io
Resolves: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/426
@ara4n ara4n added the proposal A matrix spec change proposal label Jun 15, 2018
@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

Throwing a perhaps worthless idea out there, but would it be worthwhile to change this to an "-as-rooms" proposal instead? Instead of adding an api for registering AS, we define a state event and a specific room that HS admins are automatically joined to.

@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

My immediate reaction is that might be taking the "as rooms" concept too far. In general I don't have concerns with additional API endpoints being added to provide some sugar on top of the implementation, so a homeserver could make it a room if it wants

@turt2live turt2live mentioned this issue Jul 31, 2019
Open
@turt2live turt2live added the kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff label Apr 21, 2020
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
@non-Jedi non-Jedi mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2022
Open
@ara4n ara4n transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec May 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
application services kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@turt2live @ara4n @anoadragon453 @richvdh @non-Jedi