You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Workflow Run RO-Crate infrastructure currently (to the best of our knowledge) does not support an entity that describes the reason for the RO-Crate. For simulation output this would related to the problem definition or problem specification. For a more general RO-Crate, this might be some sort of motivation for its existence.
The head node for an RO-Crate is a "DataSet", but his could possibly have two types if an appropriate type can be identified, but we probably need to remain within the confines of Workflow Run RO-Crate standards.
This field would appear in the top level ./ entity and point to another CreativeWork (which is a superset for DataSet), which is the problem definition. The keywords field would then have list of our DefinedTerms to pin down the phase field problem category and/or any other categorization such as application or material related keywords.
The Workflow Run RO-Crate infrastructure currently (to the best of our knowledge) does not support an entity that describes the reason for the RO-Crate. For simulation output this would related to the problem definition or problem specification. For a more general RO-Crate, this might be some sort of motivation for its existence.
The head node for an RO-Crate is a "DataSet", but his could possibly have two types if an appropriate type can be identified, but we probably need to remain within the confines of Workflow Run RO-Crate standards.
This question should be asked on the Workflow Run RO-Crate discussion channel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: