Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2022. It is now read-only.

dissimilarities in area values - raster / terra/ GRASS #10

Open
Ohm-Np opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

dissimilarities in area values - raster / terra/ GRASS #10

Ohm-Np opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Ohm-Np
Copy link

Ohm-Np commented Jan 18, 2022

I have done area comparison for a polygon using grass, raster functions - from branch master & terra functions - from branch terra and found some dissimilarities in the result as you can see in the table.

Area of polygon: 1094.880915 sqkm

WDPA_ID name value (grass) sqkm value (raster) sqkm value (terra) sqkm
6675 area_2001 997.573036 126.3151016 126.4386520
6675 area_2020 872.536478 21.0387268 21.0594864
- - - - -
6675 loss_2002 0.762019 0.7674429 1.3987885
6675 loss_2019 8.174405 8.178824 0.5946693
6675 loss_2020 21.054441 21.03873 8.1867638

The area from raster and terra are almost same but the area from GRASS seems reasonable. However, the loss value is similar for GRASS and raster. For terra, it might be error in subtraction from my side while computing loss as I didn't use lossCalc function.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant