You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am not sure if this is implemented yet, but, if refcounts are expensive, it could be worthwhile to mark some values as not refcounted at all - Python interpreter doesn't exist without None, True, False, integers -5 ... 256, empty tuple, empty Unicode.... so it doesn't make sense to count references to these at all - there are not even many real uses in threading environments for tracking the number of references to these singleton objects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not sure if this is implemented yet, but, if refcounts are expensive, it could be worthwhile to mark some values as not refcounted at all - Python interpreter doesn't exist without
None
,True
,False
, integers -5 ... 256, empty tuple, empty Unicode.... so it doesn't make sense to count references to these at all - there are not even many real uses in threading environments for tracking the number of references to these singleton objects.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: