New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

findall or findvalues #42

Open

jnothman opened this issue Sep 1, 2016 · 0 comments

jnothman commented Sep 1, 2016

Being able to avoid [match.values for match in path.find(obj)] would be more user-friendly. Even re has findall.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment