You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just a quick comment of my first impression while skimming through the current progress:
The very first graphic that appears in the report looks like it belongs in a medical or biology textbook. I feel like that might throw off the perception of the reader, especially if they don't know ahead of time what DART/KIDO is. Having a picture of a skeleton makes perfect sense for explaining the Skeleton class, but I wonder if we can have a picture that's either (1) more cartoonish or (2) a robotic skeleton instead of an anatomical human skeleton.
This obviously isn't an urgent concern, but I think it's worth considering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just a quick comment of my first impression while skimming through the current progress:
The very first graphic that appears in the report looks like it belongs in a medical or biology textbook. I feel like that might throw off the perception of the reader, especially if they don't know ahead of time what DART/KIDO is. Having a picture of a skeleton makes perfect sense for explaining the Skeleton class, but I wonder if we can have a picture that's either (1) more cartoonish or (2) a robotic skeleton instead of an anatomical human skeleton.
This obviously isn't an urgent concern, but I think it's worth considering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: