You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just noticed that merely using int86/int86x() functions adds 780 bytes, 768 of which is (3 x 256) bytes consisting of INT xxh; RET for each possible interrupt.
So the solution, at least for MS-DOS 16-bit builds, is to not use these functions!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a moderately big deal to me when I am trying to reduce bloat in DOSLIB executables short of just writing it in asm or writing C without the runtime.
I just noticed that merely using int86/int86x() functions adds 780 bytes, 768 of which is (3 x 256) bytes consisting of INT xxh; RET for each possible interrupt.
So the solution, at least for MS-DOS 16-bit builds, is to not use these functions!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: