Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

<Object>.copy() return a dictionary rather than original object #137

Open
mike-sosa-sofarocean opened this issue Oct 2, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@mike-sosa-sofarocean
Copy link

Of course one can use copy.copy or copy.deepcopy but it would be nice to have __copy__ defined to return another object rather than a dictionary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant