-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revision of definition of "memory" (GO_0007613) #5
Comments
I would certainly approve of a change along these lines
BS
…On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 5:40 AM, matentzn ***@***.***> wrote:
I am trying to consolidate relevant ontologies that model anything related
to cognition and behaviour, such as Mammalian Phenotype, GO, MFOEM,
Drosophila Phenotype and more.
Based on probably the same misunderstanding you faced when building the
model for "memory" (GO_0007613), I created a ticket asking for a revision
of the definition in GO itself (geneontology/go-ontology#14913
<geneontology/go-ontology#14913>), but they
convinced me to come to you. For the sake of creating a consistent model of
learning and memory across ontologies, would you consider to rework your
definition (treating memory as a disposition, and therefore a
BFO:continuant, rather than a process, as was the intention by the GO term?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH6qN7quDTGn9IF3pK_L6fHSiZi2WBCkks5tOauggaJpZM4RuIMo>
.
|
Is there any person who would be allowed to make such a decision? I wouldn't mind taking care of the redefinition, but I would need access to the repo. |
@jannahastings should be able to give you access. Otherwise fork and make a pull request. We should probably discuss moving this repo to a more general org. Perhaps obophenotype? |
Hi, sorry I'm coming to this discussion a bit late; feel free to fork and make a pull request, although I can also make changes on your behalf, do you already have a proposed definition? |
@dosumis do you want to have a coffee some time to catch up and talk about this? |
I am trying to consolidate relevant ontologies that model anything related to cognition and behaviour, such as Mammalian Phenotype, GO, MFOEM, Drosophila Phenotype and more.
Based on probably the same misunderstanding you faced when building the model for "memory" (GO_0007613), I created a ticket asking for a revision of the definition in GO itself (geneontology/go-ontology#14913), but they convinced me to come to you. For the sake of creating a consistent model of learning and memory across ontologies, would you consider to rework your definition (treating memory as a disposition, and therefore a BFO:continuant, rather than a process, as was the intention by the GO term?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: