Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revision of definition of "memory" (GO_0007613) #5

Open
matentzn opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Revision of definition of "memory" (GO_0007613) #5

matentzn opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matentzn
Copy link

I am trying to consolidate relevant ontologies that model anything related to cognition and behaviour, such as Mammalian Phenotype, GO, MFOEM, Drosophila Phenotype and more.

Based on probably the same misunderstanding you faced when building the model for "memory" (GO_0007613), I created a ticket asking for a revision of the definition in GO itself (geneontology/go-ontology#14913), but they convinced me to come to you. For the sake of creating a consistent model of learning and memory across ontologies, would you consider to rework your definition (treating memory as a disposition, and therefore a BFO:continuant, rather than a process, as was the intention by the GO term?

@matentzn matentzn changed the title Revision of definition of "memory" ( Revision of definition of "memory" (GO_0007613) Jan 26, 2018
@phismith
Copy link
Collaborator

phismith commented Jan 27, 2018 via email

@matentzn
Copy link
Author

matentzn commented Jan 31, 2018

Is there any person who would be allowed to make such a decision? I wouldn't mind taking care of the redefinition, but I would need access to the repo.

@dosumis
Copy link

dosumis commented May 3, 2018

@dosumis
Copy link

dosumis commented May 3, 2018

Is there any person who would be allowed to make such a decision? I wouldn't mind taking care of the redefinition, but I would need access to the repo.

@jannahastings should be able to give you access. Otherwise fork and make a pull request. We should probably discuss moving this repo to a more general org. Perhaps obophenotype?

@jannahastings
Copy link
Owner

Hi, sorry I'm coming to this discussion a bit late; feel free to fork and make a pull request, although I can also make changes on your behalf, do you already have a proposed definition?

@jannahastings jannahastings self-assigned this May 3, 2018
@jannahastings
Copy link
Owner

@dosumis do you want to have a coffee some time to catch up and talk about this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants