Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize class/label information #569

Open
bwsw opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Harmonize class/label information #569

bwsw opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bwsw
Copy link
Contributor

bwsw commented Nov 22, 2023

Currently, there are multiple ways to define classes and their labels and two ways to process that information. It looks like the state is not in sync, which can lead to unexpected and tricky results. We need to implement a single source of truth and prevent situations that can lead to unexpected results.

Our methods must allow setting:

  • a class range without labels but with confidence constraints (leads to labels in class_0 format);
  • a label list defined with a file with confidence constraints (leads to the contiguous class range);
  • specific "label/class" pairs with confidence constraints and additional filtering options.

Our infrastructure, not nvinfer infrastructure, must handle all methods. Default processing must be implemented with our infrastructure, not nvinfer infrastructure.

@bwsw bwsw added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 22, 2023
@bwsw bwsw added this to the 0.2.7 milestone Nov 22, 2023
@bwsw bwsw removed this from the 0.2.7 milestone Dec 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant