You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My current thinking is that I do not think we need this for CMIP7.
So, I would say let's for now continue with only global GCB data.
However, it could allow for having a more detailed look at the methods of harmonization at the regional level, understanding the harmonized pathways better, and thus also having a more sophisticated global outcome, which could teach us something about how to do global harmonization methods in the future for CO2 AFOLU.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was brought up by Jonas here.
My current thinking is that I do not think we need this for CMIP7.
So, I would say let's for now continue with only global GCB data.
However, it could allow for having a more detailed look at the methods of harmonization at the regional level, understanding the harmonized pathways better, and thus also having a more sophisticated global outcome, which could teach us something about how to do global harmonization methods in the future for CO2 AFOLU.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: