Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TASK] Verbosity Options for simulation speed #21

Open
5 of 10 tasks
klfrick2 opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
5 of 10 tasks

[TASK] Verbosity Options for simulation speed #21

klfrick2 opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
task New feature or request

Comments

@klfrick2
Copy link

klfrick2 commented Dec 3, 2020


Defect Description

Describe the defect
For a monte carlo simulation of cash flows in TEAL is there a way to turn off the "write to screen" options for TEAL as this slows down the simulation drastically.

What did you expect to see happen?

I expected that I could turn off write to terminal for each cashflow

What did you see instead?

I was unable to turn off the print to screen options.

Do you have a suggested fix for the development team?

Verbosity options.

Describe how to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Try and turn off the write to screen options in the input files attached. I am unaware of how to do this. Files attached in the zip file.

Error.zip

Screenshots and Input Files
Please attach the input file(s) that generate this error. The simpler the input, the faster we can find the issue.

Platform (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Version: [e.g. 22]
  • Dependencies Installation: [CONDA or PIP]

For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

  • 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or task?
  • 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
  • 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
  • 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
  • 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

  • 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
  • 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
  • 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
  • 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest release branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with release (create if needed)?
  • 5. If the issue is being closed without a pull request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?
@klfrick2 klfrick2 added the defect Something isn't working label Dec 3, 2020
@alfoa alfoa added task New feature or request and removed defect Something isn't working labels Jan 29, 2021
@alfoa alfoa changed the title [DEFECT] Verbosity Options for simulation speed [TASK] Verbosity Options for simulation speed Jan 29, 2021
@alfoa
Copy link
Collaborator

alfoa commented Jan 29, 2021

This is related to idaholab/raven#1423

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
task New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants