Data review and synthesis

[writerly03]

No description provided.

[writerly03]

This has been delayed as the survey has not yet gone out.

[reikopleau]

Survey complete with 83 responses

See email for raw data sheet!

[reikopleau]

Analysis worksheet for Q19 (text input): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oWqaJLlDIbCjt9s5GTpQdjKflilMspDJVu-s7VfhcSA/edit?usp=sharing

*this is about half of the responses, more to be added to this worksheet

[reikopleau]

Final draft visualizations (link updated AUG 28): https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10nZWe7KYr48CEQgJdQkuAT652l02RaGB/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=107712133375824394765&rtpof=true&sd=true

*Changed vizzes showing average rankings to MEDIAN rankings.

Reasoning:

• When the data includes outliers, the median is better to show than the average, as it isn't affected by extreme values.
• Data is ordinal (ranks, satisfaction levels). With ordinal data, the median is often more meaningful.
• The median is helpful in showing the "typical" value/central value in a dataset without being affected by extremes/outliers.

[reikopleau]

Respondents’ concerns about DLT for digital cultural asset storage X Levels of familiarity:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18LJm60oCNTz5cRtuF4yaQTJqLNacIaQc/view?usp=drive_link

[reikopleau]

Update, re: Q3 — only one of the respondents who selected ‘Other’ listed the service they use: Bluehost. The rest (8 respondents total) didn’t fill in the optional text box.

Also, Q16 got skipped in the viz process but I caught it, so here’s the viz for that one:

New viz for collection scale X bytesize

and another for Budget X Role

Updated slides have been added to the Drive.