-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SD3]The quality of the images generated by the inference is not as high as on the validation set during fine-tuning? #10475
Comments
Is it resolved? if not, could you provide a little detail on what dataset you fine-tuned and what is the prompt you are providing for inferencing? |
My dataset is photos of vehicles of different makes. The prompt I provided in the inference phase and the “validation_prompt” used in the fine tuning with dreambooth_lora are the same prompt, but the quality of the resulting image is much worse than the one shown by the “validation” in the tensorboard during training.
|
@ytwo-hub Let me know if it helps. |
Your suggestion works, especially if it works better after I add the "negativate prompt". Thank you very much! |
Glad to help you out. |
Describe the bug
Why is the quality of the graphs I generate with
StableDiffusion3Pipeline
not as good as the quality of the images in the validation set in the log generated when using dreambooth_lora for fine tuning?Maybe I need some other plugin or parameter setting to maintain the same image quality as the validation set?
Reproduction
Logs
No response
System Info
Diffuser Version: stable-diffusion-3-medium
CUDA Version: 12.4
GPU: NVIDIA A800 80GB
Who can help?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: