Skip to content

Defer: client expectations on subsequent payloads’ path #46

Answered by glasser
BoD asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I'm reasonably sure based on my understanding of the spec that only the first version is correct — but I think the spec should have some more examples/clarity to be explicit that subsequent payloads are always "here's a subtree with the place to splice it in" and not "here's some more tree, rooted at the top, to be merged in".

Replies: 1 comment 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@robrichard
Comment options

@robrichard
Comment options

@glasser
Comment options

Answer selected by robrichard
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
3 participants