You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue was posted on the MuJoCo mailing list but it was advised to (a) ensure that sensors provide the information needed and (b) post follow-ons here.
We are trying to use MJPC to control a crane with three actuators. These actuators have to be intvelocity. But that seems to mean we have to provide the act part of the MuJoCo state to MJPC. If we don't or we estimate it, MJPC trajectories diverge considerably. We have looked at the documentation of our crane motors and there is no obvious thing that we can read. Have also contacted the manufacturer.
Meanwhile, is there a workaround? Is it possible to just work with qpos and qvel part of the state even with intvelocity actuators? Any links to papers where MJPC has been interfaced with physical robots would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue was posted on the MuJoCo mailing list but it was advised to (a) ensure that sensors provide the information needed and (b) post follow-ons here.
We are trying to use MJPC to control a crane with three actuators. These actuators have to be intvelocity. But that seems to mean we have to provide the act part of the MuJoCo state to MJPC. If we don't or we estimate it, MJPC trajectories diverge considerably. We have looked at the documentation of our crane motors and there is no obvious thing that we can read. Have also contacted the manufacturer.
Meanwhile, is there a workaround? Is it possible to just work with qpos and qvel part of the state even with intvelocity actuators? Any links to papers where MJPC has been interfaced with physical robots would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: