Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jamie, Can you mention git Large File Storage? #11

Open
5 tasks
dantho opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks

Jamie, Can you mention git Large File Storage? #11

dantho opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested unicorn

Comments

@dantho
Copy link
Collaborator

dantho commented Sep 21, 2021

One of our product's domain-specific file types, "pattern files" is often stored as source code in binary form in our customers' programs. (Our customers use our product to write their own code. They can use Git, too!) The largest single repos can have multiple GB of such pattern files.

  • Does Git LFS (Large File Storage) handle those files seamlessly, as if they were inside the repo?
  • If I change 1 bit in a 1 GB file, does LFS minimize bandwidth during push/pull?
  • Can we hook in a custom diff utility for changes to these binary files?
  • Advanced topic: There's an ASCII equivalent source for these binary files, but the compile step can take 10's of minutes for larger files. (Thus the tendency to store the binary files.) Should we encourage ASCII source storage instead of binary files?
  • Advanced topic: Assuming a repo is storing the ASCII pattern source, is there a CI or Git Action that we can use to automatically kick off our pattern compiler after a pull, but only on any ASCII source file that has changed?
@dantho dantho added question Further information is requested unicorn labels Sep 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested unicorn
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants