Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we make negative lists of fields for each template table #92

Open
tobiasgf opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Can we make negative lists of fields for each template table #92

tobiasgf opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tobiasgf
Copy link
Collaborator

tobiasgf commented Apr 9, 2024

Currently, the tool does not object to any placement of most fields, even if the placement would indicate a wrongly formatted dataset.

The fields DNA_sequence, scientificName, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus can only logically be placed in the taxonomy table, but currently you can provide them in the Sample and Study table as well.

The fields eventDate, decimalLatitude, decimalLongitude, associatedSequences, materialSampleID can only logically be placed in the Sample (or in special cases in the Study) table, but currently you can provide them in the Taxonomy.

There are softer situations, but the above cases are almost always certainly wrong.

Can we make negative lists of fields that throws a warning if these are present in the (ir)relevant table upon upload?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant