Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pedigree based phasing #40

Open
gaow opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Pedigree based phasing #40

gaow opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@gaow
Copy link
Owner

gaow commented Mar 3, 2022

Some benchmark papers might be a good starting point to this investigation:

  1. Accuracy with rare variants, featuring their own work GIGI and Ped_Pop : https://genome.cshlp.org/content/29/1/125.full.pdf notice here Beagle is version 4.1. In fact here it shows that merlin does a decent job with dense markers. Notice that phasing is performed by MORGAN
  2. Benchmark on cattle pedigree, featuring Beagle 5.2 https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-022-08354-6

Also this paper seems promising but it did not compare with other family based methods such as MERLIN or GIGI.

At this point, it is unclear what to use. MORGAN, like MERLIN, is based on Lander-Green for small pedigrees but a hybrid MCMC based on both Elston-Stewart and Lander-Green to handle large pedigrees. However, Lander-Green works under the linkage equilibrium assumption (which does not hold for dense markers) and unlike MERLIN, it is not clear how (or if!) MORGAN/GIGI handle LD. I need to read more into these.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant