Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider switching from unittestpp to Catch? #273

Open
floooh opened this issue Oct 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Consider switching from unittestpp to Catch? #273

floooh opened this issue Oct 29, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@floooh
Copy link
Owner

floooh commented Oct 29, 2017

See here: https://github.com/philsquared/Catch

It's header-only so probably doesn't require all the complicated build system support that UnitTest++ does...

@floooh
Copy link
Owner Author

floooh commented Oct 31, 2017

Recommended as alternative to Catch: https://github.com/onqtam/doctest

@pixelherodev
Copy link
Contributor

...whoa. Thanks for linking doctest! I've been using Catch because it was the quickest to integrate, but the compile time cost was atrocious, this is a huge help!

@floooh
Copy link
Owner Author

floooh commented Aug 3, 2019

Btw, for my emulator stuff and the sokol headers I'm now using https://github.com/sheredom/utest.h, it's also super-easy to integrate since it's just a single C header (not C++).

@pixelherodev
Copy link
Contributor

pixelherodev commented Aug 4, 2019

Even better, thanks! :)

For some of my C projects, I've been using Catch (DocTest now) because I couldn't find any good C testers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants