-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve metrics API explanation #5
Comments
Good point... I'm creating an issue to address the concern. |
Just wondering, have you also considered creating a summary class with methods rather than having separate functions for transformations? I.e. you would call |
What you are describing is similar to what we had before. We had a long conversation about "summary as an object" route... The main argument against was that the "results" should be simple objects rather than objects with APIs of their own. Maybe @adrinjalali can add. When it comes to the metrics engine (as appearing in proposal--not all parts are currently implemented), the parts that I like are:
I am less happy about the mechanism around
We should discuss. |
I know y'all have a very good understanding of this proposal, but as somebody who's not as familiar with the API as you are, I have a hard time following the proposal. It'd be nice if you could have a motivation, explain the status quo, and explain what the proposed API does and how. It'd make it easier for the rest of us to follow :)
Originally posted by @adrinjalali in #1 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: