You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here there is definitely kind of an issue. If you run hourglass with 40 features in, 20 out and compression_factor=0.5, how small would you expect the smallest layer to be? Today it will be 20, so the 20 out nodes can be pushed right through. To me it definitely seems reasonable to have the compression-factor multiply the smallest of in and out-nodes. But some care must (maybe) be taken in ensuring that it has the right nr of in-neurons as well, and that the slope from 40 to the smallest layer of 10 is reasonable, and that the slope from 10 to 20 is reasonable. It can definitely no longer use lstm_symmetric directly:-p
flikka
changed the title
Update hourglass models to be base on smallest of input/output
Update hourglass models (or make a new one?) to be base on smallest of input/output
Oct 15, 2019
#368 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: