You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is no structuring or information to tell that an element is a zone or a horizon in the stratigraphy block in the global config.
Without this we can’t make pydantic logic to ensure all zones have a top and base defined.
The top and base goes into the metadata but it is optional (since it is not required for horizons) and hence becomes unreliable since many users don’t specify the top and base horizon for their zones.
We could potentially structure the stratigraphy different so that the keys are zones and each zone has a top/base horizon defined under it.
We could also look into splitting out the stratigraphy mapping in a separate block/file. And then when we do a look-up and convert the name and set stratigraphic=True for the user if it is present in this mapping.
current
potential change
This could be exported by RMS, and might be even more smooth once roxar supports accessing the stratigraphic column (RMS14.5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is no structuring or information to tell that an element is a
zone
or ahorizon
in thestratigraphy
block in the global config.Without this we can’t make pydantic logic to ensure all zones have a top and base defined.
The top and base goes into the metadata but it is optional (since it is not required for horizons) and hence becomes unreliable since many users don’t specify the top and base horizon for their zones.
We could potentially structure the stratigraphy different so that the keys are zones and each zone has a top/base horizon defined under it.
We could also look into splitting out the stratigraphy mapping in a separate block/file. And then when we do a look-up and convert the name and set
stratigraphic=True
for the user if it is present in this mapping.This could be exported by RMS, and might be even more smooth once roxar supports accessing the stratigraphic column (RMS14.5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: