You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following my extensive analysis of ILVOs BioSample metadata I should do the same on our emo bon ones
In particular
do we use URLs whereever we can
how do we refer to SOPs
Is it clear from the metadata fields what gene type (if just one) is included
do we include genoscope SOPs in the experiement metadata (if that is what the experiment metadata are supposed to include)?
In other words, to a complete outsider, do our ENA metadata provide FULL provenance and reusability?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note to self:
For the samples that are going for shotgun metagenomics, we will have one run accession per sample accession, unless sequencing is repeated. In that case, we will have multiple run accessions for one sample accession.
For the samples that are going for metabarcoding, we will have (at least) two run accessions (one per gene) for one sample accession.
Following my extensive analysis of ILVOs BioSample metadata I should do the same on our emo bon ones
In particular
In other words, to a complete outsider, do our ENA metadata provide FULL provenance and reusability?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: