You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey,
similarity filtering behaves strangely, selecting groups of species that are really similar but dissimilar from other groups. I suspect the reason is that the algorithm is trying to minimize the sum of similarity not the average?
I think it is (at least partly) an artifact of the fact that, with an allometric model for interactions, each species eats everything that falls within a range (which is not realistic). If you add
N <- 5e+05 # the number of random values to replace inds <- round ( runif(N, 1, length(L)) ) # draw random values from [1, length(L)] L[inds] <- 0 # use the random values as indicies to L, for which to replace
after line 18 in the example, average of non-zero similarities is lower after filtering.
Hey,
similarity filtering behaves strangely, selecting groups of species that are really similar but dissimilar from other groups. I suspect the reason is that the algorithm is trying to minimize the sum of similarity not the average?
example
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: