Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing upgrade docs to refer to 9.0 instead of 8.0 #16977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

robbavey
Copy link
Member

This commit updates the Logstash upgrade docs to refer to 9.0/9.x instead of 8.0/8.x

Copy link
Contributor

📃 DOCS PREVIEWhttps://logstash_bk_16977.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/diff

Copy link
Contributor

@mashhurs mashhurs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Once landed, I will rebase #16979

** <<security-on-8.0,Secure communication with Elasticsearch>>
** <<bc-field-ref-parser,Field parser is more strict>>

** <<ssl-settings-9.0,Changes to SSL settings in {ls} plugins>>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉


If you haven't already, upgrade to version {prev-major-last} before you upgrade to 8.0. If
If you haven't already, upgrade to version {prev-major-last} before you upgrade to 9.0. If
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

{prev-major-last} magically 🎆 showing 8.17.1 disappeared (I am guessing Karen quickly fixed it or something was wrong when I hit accessed the page) and now rendered correctly!

@robbavey robbavey changed the title [wip] Changing upgrade docs to refer to 9.0 instead of 8.0 Changing upgrade docs to refer to 9.0 instead of 8.0 Jan 29, 2025
@karenzone karenzone merged commit 70a6c9a into elastic:main Jan 29, 2025
5 checks passed
@karenzone
Copy link
Contributor

20895

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants