Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Robust factor analysis #225

Open
DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Robust factor analysis #225

DominiqueMakowski opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Feature idea 🔥 New feature or request

Comments

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

Now that correlation is on CRAN, we could add robust=F option to factor_analysis so that it would be based on a robust correlation method (spearman, percentage bend, sheperd's pi or biweight via robust_method).

@DominiqueMakowski DominiqueMakowski added the Feature idea 🔥 New feature or request label Mar 18, 2020
@mattansb
Copy link
Member

The idea of "robust" is weird - robust measures are measures less affected by changes in data values, which Spearman's corr is because it is on ranked data. But it is not like it gives the same info as Pearson's corr - both test different things. Just like the median isn't a "robust" mean...

All this to day - are we documenting well enough for this?


Also, yes, "robust" PCA/FA sounds like a great idea😜

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member Author

The idea of "robust" is weird - robust measures are measures less affected by changes in data values, which Spearman's corr is because it is on ranked data. But it is not like it gives the same info as Pearson's corr - both test different things. Just like the median isn't a "robust" mean...

Yes that's very true, although the rank conversion can eventually mitigate for the effect of outliers (let's say you have the same correlated data, spearman and Pearson giving roughly the same results, if you add one big outlier, the Pearson correlation will take off, while Spearman will remain mostly calm ☮️), so in that sense, it is sort of a robust correlation method? but then what does robust even mean... anyway that's eventually a discussion to have on correlation 😁

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member

Is this still important for parameters, or something for correlation?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature idea 🔥 New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants