Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do you compare the solving time between default SCIP policies and learned policies ? #8

Open
cloud-waiting-for-wind opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@cloud-waiting-for-wind
Copy link

Great job! Very inspiring.

However, I think there is a lack of comparison of solving time between different methods in the same instances.
Although the paper reports the number of nodes explored by learned and SCIP policies, the number of nodes and solving time are not exactly equivalent. Neural network policies maybe run faster than default SCIP policies with the same number of explored nodes.

A lot of people pay attention to ML4CO because of its potential to speed up solving MILP problems. It would be better and more intuitive that there is a solving time comparison, just like Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks, Gasse et al.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant