-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new discount function: Exponential-Power #147
Labels
Comments
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2016
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2016
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2016
Need to work on matrix power (delay ^ tau)
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 23, 2016
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2017
alpha_precision ~ dgamma(0.001,0.001)
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2017
more restrictive priors, based upon analysis of real data from my lab
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2017
drbenvincent
changed the title
new 'secret' discount function model
new discount function: Exponential-Power
Apr 30, 2017
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2017
Changes based around experimentMultiPanelFigure() method. Aims to make it easier to extend and compose a different series of experiment related plots based on the model type. For example, plotting subjective time functions (see #147). Has involved moving some methods to superclasses
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2017
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2017
Fixed error with this line of DF_ExponentialPower.m y = exp( - theta.k .* x.^theta.tau );
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2017
This is now working pretty well on data from my lab. There is probably scope to be a bit more informed about the priors, but they seem to be working well for the data I have so far. |
drbenvincent
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2017
Error was in ExponentialPower.m. It was using the wrong subjective time function.
The issue of numerical instability continues. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
My version
This is very similar to the discount function proposed by Ebert & Prelec (2007):
Implement properly for JAGS at the moment.
STAN models are very poor for this discount function (as they are with others). For the moment, just focus on JAGS and come back to STAN later. There are more general issues with STAN that I'm having with other discount functions.
Avoiding hierarchical (group level) inference with this model
Because the joint posterior over (k, tau) is complex, I've decided to skip implementing this for the moment. Sticking with just the 'separate' or the 'mixed' models
Update priors and improve model stability
We have been getting issues with
VB=inf
orVB=NaN
because of certain parameter combinations of(k, tau)
.New subplot of subjective time
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: