You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to support OpenID Connect it needs to be checked to which extend we need to support other response_types and response_modes and how these could be implemented (using as much of the existing code as possible).
Some open questions are:
If the auth code token response also contains an id_token, why would I want to request it with request_type=code id_token?
Likewise, why would I want to send a request_type=code token id_token?
If there are valid use cases for the two points above (which are not covered by request_type=code, how can we tell AuthorizationCodeGrant to use the fragment rather than the query part of the redirect URL? Do we need another HybridGrant for that?
How to tell an ImplicitGrant to also request the id_token type?
(How) Do we support ImplictGrant with only a id_token and no token? Maybe as a new ImplicitIdTokenGrant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In order to support OpenID Connect it needs to be checked to which extend we need to support other
response_type
s andresponse_mode
s and how these could be implemented (using as much of the existing code as possible).Some open questions are:
id_token
, why would I want to request it withrequest_type=code id_token
?request_type=code token id_token
?request_type=code
, how can we tellAuthorizationCodeGrant
to use the fragment rather than the query part of the redirect URL? Do we need anotherHybridGrant
for that?ImplicitGrant
to also request theid_token
type?ImplictGrant
with only aid_token
and notoken
? Maybe as a newImplicitIdTokenGrant
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: