Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

microtuning (modes) vs tempered tuning #1

Open
erlkonig opened this issue Mar 13, 2012 · 2 comments
Open

microtuning (modes) vs tempered tuning #1

erlkonig opened this issue Mar 13, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@erlkonig
Copy link

Any particular modal tuning could start on any note. Hence, aeolian could start on the traditional A, or instead could start the same set of intervals from some other base pitch. In either case, it would not follow tempered tuning pitches, having a pure fifth instead of the slightly flat one we're used to, and other, much more obvious differences. This is also why trying to modulate through a grand circle of fifths in modal tuning is a disaster :-) For any given scale, an option to specify a specific frequency for tonic, along with which mode to use - the (notes-to-pitches aeolian 'Bb) looks like the right basic idea if one can just give a frequency in place of 'Bb - with a way to produce specific frequencies for the resulting notes, should be enough. Is there any plan to deal with detailed tunings at this level?

@dmansen
Copy link
Owner

dmansen commented Mar 13, 2012

Whoa! I did not expect anybody to look at this project! Just something I threw together for fun over the weekend. However, if there's interest, I'll definitely look into adding that. Not quite sure what it would involve, but I did want to make the logic for interval arithmetic more generic and useful, so that would probably fit in naturally.

Out of curiosity, how did you end up finding this?

@erlkonig
Copy link
Author

My github-mad friend, Charles Duffy, says:

"It was featured on disclojure, a blog which assembles things people
mention about Clojure on Twitter."

On 03/12/2012 08:31 PM, dmansen wrote:

Whoa! I did not expect anybody to look at this project! Just something I threw together for fun over the weekend. However, if there's interest, I'll definitely look into adding that. Not quite sure what it would involve, but I did want to make the logic for interval arithmetic more generic and useful, so that would probably fit in naturally.

Out of curiosity, how did you end up finding this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants