Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal to the Usage Board #64

Open
osma opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Proposal to the Usage Board #64

osma opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@osma
Copy link
Collaborator

osma commented Sep 24, 2024

We need a more formal proposal to the Usage Board about what we would like from them. Something like

  • consider adding the classes and properties that we didn't find in DCTerms/BIBO to either DCTerms or BIBO
    • the list could be prioritized and indicate what's proposed for DCTerms and what's for BIBO
    • most important are those that aren't found anywhere else; 2nd is non-BIBO elements; 3rd is what's already in BIBO
  • if not everything can be added to the above, coin a SRAP namespace (but we don't like this option because it's just leftovers)
  • when done, publish SRAP documents (main document, TAP, examples) on the DCMI website

In addition to the proposal we need a presentation (slides or explanatory document) to explain SRAP briefly, for example in a meeting with the UB.

@kcoyle
Copy link
Collaborator

kcoyle commented Sep 24, 2024

Found elsewhere

bibo:eissn
bibo:isbn
bibo:isbn
bibo:issn
bibo:issue
bibo:pageEnd
bibo:pageStart
bibo:presentedAt
bibo:volume
foaf:name
schema:affiliation
schema:funder
schema:funding

Not found anywhere

srap:accessibilityStatement
srap:dateRetracted
srap:embargoDateRange
srap:project
srap:role

@osma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

osma commented Oct 4, 2024

I've contacted Niklas and Tom asking for their advice on taking this to the UB.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants