Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bioregistry as IRI candidate discovery source #23

Closed
JJ-Author opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed

Add bioregistry as IRI candidate discovery source #23

JJ-Author opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 10 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JJ-Author
Copy link
Collaborator

see e.g. https://bioregistry.io/registry/ero
offer json output including download links and uri scheme as starting point for Archivo

@JJ-Author JJ-Author added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2022
@cthoyt
Copy link
Contributor

cthoyt commented Nov 14, 2022

Hi @JJ-Author, I am one of the maintainers of the Bioregistry. I am happy to answer any questions you have about it, discuss potential new features, content, exports, etc.

@JJ-Author
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hey, @cthoyt thanks for your message. Indeed i found that you also provide RDF here https://bioregistry.io/download
but this option is not shown here https://bioregistry.io/registry/ when clicking the download button. Is there a reason for that? (live export vs. snashot releases?)

@cthoyt
Copy link
Contributor

cthoyt commented Nov 15, 2022

Yes, it's the case that the RDF dump is generated on the nightly build and isn't part of the live website. You can expect that it's up-to-date though, since everything is automated!

Direct download link: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry/main/exports/rdf/schema.ttl https://github.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry/blob/main/exports/rdf/bioregistry.ttl

@RiddhiMenroy
Copy link

Is this thread still active?
I'm very new to github, could you please guide me on what's going on in here

@JJ-Author
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JJ-Author commented Jan 3, 2023

Hey @RiddhiMenroy, with the issues tagged as "enhancements" we keep record of our wishlist. We might tackle these once we have free resources or a student that is interested in doing it.
But feel free to comment what you are looking for.

@cthoyt
Copy link
Contributor

cthoyt commented Mar 16, 2023

hi @JJ-Author and @RiddhiMenroy, is there anything I can do from the Bioregistry side to help this out?

@RiddhiMenroy
Copy link

RiddhiMenroy commented Mar 18, 2023 via email

@yum-yab yum-yab added this to the Databus 2.1 migration milestone Sep 26, 2023
@yum-yab
Copy link
Contributor

yum-yab commented Sep 27, 2023

Bioregistry is now part of the discovery process.

I used the registry available at https://bioregistry.io/api/registry?format=json, and the download_rdf and the download_owl fields since all archivo needs are the RDF files.
Unfortunately many ontologies do not have that field, is there a better way to access turtle/rdfxml files of the bioregistry ontologies @cthoyt?

@cthoyt
Copy link
Contributor

cthoyt commented Sep 27, 2023

Many of the resources in the Bioregistry neither have an RDF nor OWL artifact associated with them, so this isn't a surprise. If I had to guess, maybe <5% of the resources for which an RDF or OWL actually exists do not have it already annotated in the Bioregistry (i.e., low false negative rate)

FYI, some of them might have download_obo which you can convert to OWL using robot.

@yum-yab
Copy link
Contributor

yum-yab commented Sep 27, 2023

Ok, but the parsing of obo files (and generally more supported formats) is an issue of its own. I'll close this one in favor of this one

@yum-yab yum-yab closed this as completed Sep 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants