You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 31, 2020. It is now read-only.
The LICENSE file claims that the code is released under Apache 2.0:
Copyright 2008-2015 Object.NET, Inc.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Contact:
http://object.net
[email protected]
+1(888)775-5888
But the website itself claims the code is released under the MIT licence.
Datejs is released under the MIT License and available for download at GoogleCode.
Neither of these state that the code is dual licenced. Which of these is actually correct?
The LICENSE file claims that the code is released under Apache 2.0:
But the website itself claims the code is released under the MIT licence.
Neither of these state that the code is dual licenced. Which of these is actually correct?
This issue was sparked by the following SE question:
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/7270
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: