From 6eb3aedafc9cdfaf01da7b850ab5bba53c355fab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Hoemmen Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:51:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix linalg conj ADL wording @tkoeppe @jwakely Per our offline discussion --- source/numerics.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/numerics.tex b/source/numerics.tex index 5313c5f92e..b848876d8d 100644 --- a/source/numerics.tex +++ b/source/numerics.tex @@ -12817,7 +12817,7 @@ \tcode{Accessor} if \tcode{remove_cvref_t} is an arithmetic type; otherwise, \item \tcode{Accessor} if the expression \tcode{conj(E)} is not valid for any subexpression \tcode{E} -whose type \tcode{T} is expression-equivalent to \tcode{remove_cvref_t} +whose type is \tcode{remove_cvref_t} with overload resolution performed in a context that includes the declaration \tcode{template conj(const T\&) = delete;}; and otherwise, \item @@ -12838,7 +12838,7 @@ \tcode{a} if \tcode{remove_cvref_t} is an arithmetic type; otherwise, \item \tcode{a} if the expression \tcode{conj(E)} is not valid for any subexpression \tcode{E} -whose type \tcode{T} is expression-equivalent to \tcode{remove_cvref_t} +whose type is \tcode{remove_cvref_t} with overload resolution performed in a context that includes the declaration \tcode{template conj(const T\&) = delete;}; and otherwise, \item