-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing SELinux rules (was: Empty bootupctl status
since 0.2.20)
#694
Comments
Hum, we already are using |
Looks like we also need |
|
If for whatever reason the previous command fails, then I need to
|
Ah, I think I understand now. We need to |
Hum, I still don't get any output with:
and using |
No such issue on fcos-rawhide 41.20240720.91.0
|
One likely notable difference is that Fedora CoreOS Rawhide still uses systemd 255. |
Might be systemd/systemd#32917 |
Hit this when do testing for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300306, with upgrade selinux to Set selinux to permissive to run |
|
Ugh...I knew the selinux policy would break a ton of things, we should never have done that. |
Test with latest selinux-policy, bootupctl status works, but still have selinux avc denied log
|
That's likely coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#1771 |
Looks like this has been fixed in the SELinux policy that landed in F41. |
I spoke too soon, I can still see some issues on Silverblue:
|
Part 2 in fedora-selinux/selinux-policy#2341 |
bootupctl status
since 0.2.20bootupctl status
since 0.2.20)
Freeze exception for F41: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309742 |
Part 3 in fedora-selinux/selinux-policy#2362 |
On a fresh Fedora Silverblue Rawhide installation:
This is likely due to something we missed in #663.
We should likely call
systemd-run
with--pty
or--pipe
: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/systemd-run.html#--ptyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: