Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong Scripts in Category Proxmox&Virtualization? #1709

Open
deku-m opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Wrong Scripts in Category Proxmox&Virtualization? #1709

deku-m opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
website A change to the website

Comments

@deku-m
Copy link

deku-m commented Jan 24, 2025

Please verify that you have read and understood the guidelines.

yes

What type of issue is this?

Other

A clear and concise description of the issue.

On the website Categories under Proxmox&Virtualization a couple of tools are placed there and not sure if those are the right category.
To me looks like they need to move to different location.

  • File Browser
  • Netbird / Network & Firewall?
  • Tailscale / Network & Firewall?
  • VS Code Server / Coding?
  • Webmin System / Administration Webservers?

Which browser are you using?

Firefox

If relevant, including screenshots or a code block can be helpful in clarifying the issue.

Image

Image

Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue.

Go to website check category Proxmox.

@deku-m deku-m added the website A change to the website label Jan 24, 2025
@deku-m deku-m changed the title Wrong Scripts in Category Promox? Wrong Scripts in Category Proxmox&Virtualization? Jan 24, 2025
@MickLesk
Copy link
Member

They are located there because they are mainly responsible for the Proxmox & visualization environment and are not independent LXCs.
At most, you could extend the IDs, in which case they would be present in both places.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
website A change to the website
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants