Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify lat/lon values #58

Closed
tamcap opened this issue Mar 17, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Verify lat/lon values #58

tamcap opened this issue Mar 17, 2014 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@tamcap
Copy link
Contributor

tamcap commented Mar 17, 2014

I pushed a new csv file into Durham-Data git repo. It is available here: https://github.com/codefordurham/Durham-Data/blob/master/Restaurants/establishments_geocode.csv
It contains new lat/lot values scraped from Durham Tax Data website (see commit explanation). Those should update / verify existing lat/lon values (only available for establishments with non-zero property_id).

@copelco copelco added this to the Phase 2 milestone Mar 23, 2014
@copelco
Copy link
Member

copelco commented Mar 24, 2014

@tamcap What would you think of turning this into a management command? I guess ideally we'd want the addresses file as a Shapefile or something and then scrape it periodically.

@tamcap
Copy link
Contributor Author

tamcap commented Apr 24, 2014

So I am not sure how to follow up on this.

Do we still want to replace the coordinates we get from the Durham Health API with the GIS coordinates? I can confirm that at least some of the coordinates we currently have are wrong (for example: we have ~22 establishments in the Fayetville area:question:).

@copelco copelco modified the milestones: Phase 3, Phase 2 May 6, 2014
@copelco
Copy link
Member

copelco commented May 20, 2014

@Micmaz gave us updated data, so the geo location is better. Closing for now.

@copelco copelco closed this as completed May 20, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants