Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General recommendations for systematic uncertinites for NN #39

Open
cmadrid1 opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

General recommendations for systematic uncertinites for NN #39

cmadrid1 opened this issue Sep 26, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@cmadrid1
Copy link
Contributor

cmadrid1 commented Sep 26, 2022

Every physics analysis that uses a NN goes through the process of validating their network and almost always derives systematic uncertainties to cover issues, e.g. data vs. MC.

This approach can vary and can be specific to the use case. However, general approaches and best practices can be outlined.

One reasonable method is to simply vary the input variable by their uncertainties and take the NN output variation as the systematic. However, this may not always be sufficient.

This topic has been discussed in past ML forums: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1154231/

PHYSTAT: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1172085/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant