Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PG17.1 Support - SQL changes, new features #7708

Open
5 of 27 tasks
naisila opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
5 of 27 tasks

PG17.1 Support - SQL changes, new features #7708

naisila opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@naisila
Copy link
Member

naisila commented Oct 16, 2024

Introduction

This issue tracks how Citus will handle PostgreSQL 17's SQL changes and new features. Resources that we used are the following:

Note 1: We should finish "Features to support" and "Meaningful error messages" first, then the ones that require only testing.
Note 2: You can refer to the PRs in #7138 to understand better how we should extend our test suite. Add your name to the subtask you are working on.

Features to support in Citus

We plan to support the following new options:

Meaningful error messages for currently unsupported features

For now, we will not provide support for the following, but we will print error messages with possible hints/workarounds for the user:

Add regression tests or just test locally

Most of PG17's new additions simply work with Citus. However, we add tests for some of them to ensure consistency and maintainability for the future. For some other additions, testing locally is sufficient.

yrashk added a commit to postgres-pm/pgpm that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2024
Solution: correct the dependencies and build process

Also, mark it as broken on Postgres above 16, as it isn't supported yet.
(See citusdata/citus#7708)
@naisila naisila changed the title PG17.0 Support - SQL changes, new features PG17.1 Support - SQL changes, new features Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants