You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 19, 2019. It is now read-only.
I am wondering why you aren't simply using shortcuts, soft or hard links instead of the generation of shim executables. This seems to be a much simpler way with less complications.
Why did you decide against it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies if I don't give you a direct answer but after answering the question several times already (all are searchable and readily readable) - I think we just need to document it on the wiki.
ferventcoder
changed the title
Question about shims: Why not just a shortcut or hard link?
[Documentation] Document decision for Shims versus other technologies
Dec 3, 2014
I am wondering why you aren't simply using shortcuts, soft or hard links instead of the generation of shim executables. This seems to be a much simpler way with less complications.
Why did you decide against it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: