You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
viralrecon outputs the variants_long_table.csv file with a lot of variants that have the PASS filter. However, not all of these variants make it to the assembly.
For ivar consensus, looking at the workflow's config we can see only variants with at least 75% frequency and minimum depth of 10 make it to the consensus.
The same is true if using bcftools as the caller instead. In this case, bcftools mpileup is ran first, setting a minimum depth 10 (config here). Later, there is a bcftools filter step, which in the workflow config again suggests filters for variants with >75% frequency.
For nanopore I don't know if there is a straightforward "threshold", as I assume that medaka consensus will use its own trained model to make the decision, so different types of variants may have different "thresholds"? I'm not sure...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
viralrecon
outputs thevariants_long_table.csv
file with a lot of variants that have thePASS
filter. However, not all of these variants make it to the assembly.ivar consensus
, looking at the workflow's config we can see only variants with at least 75% frequency and minimum depth of 10 make it to the consensus.bcftools
as the caller instead. In this case,bcftools mpileup
is ran first, setting a minimum depth 10 (config here). Later, there is abcftools filter
step, which in the workflow config again suggests filters for variants with >75% frequency.medaka consensus
will use its own trained model to make the decision, so different types of variants may have different "thresholds"? I'm not sure...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: