Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle abandonned servers #97

Open
Schnouki opened this issue Nov 26, 2012 · 3 comments
Open

Handle abandonned servers #97

Schnouki opened this issue Nov 26, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@Schnouki
Copy link
Member

If a server has been offline (or missing, or unresponsive) for some time (2 months?), it should be considered as lost and the local server should

  • remove its nodes that are cached locally
  • unsubscribe local users from channels on this server
  • unsubscribe remote users from local channels
@imaginator
Copy link
Member

+1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man's_switch)

On 26 November 2012 23:13, Thomas Jost [email protected] wrote:

If a server has been offline (or missing, or unresponsive) for some time
(2 months?), it should be considered as lost and the local server should

  • remove its nodes that are cached locally

  • unsubscribe local users from channels on this server

  • unsubscribe remote users from local channels


    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Handle abandonned servers #97.

Simon Tennant | buddycloud.com | +49 17 8545 0880 | office hours: goo.gl/tQgxP

@lloydwatkin
Copy link
Member

Can we make sure stuff like this gets documented somehow? Otherwise the various implementations are going to implement different features and we'll have no idea :) Good idea though :)

remoteServerKill = setTimeout(deleteServer, 5259490000); lol

@Schnouki
Copy link
Member Author

Of course, this has to be in the XEP. (Same for the MAM changes proposed in other recent issues). And I guess we'll discuss it on team@ before.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants