[TBD] At later stage, potentially introduce fee to cover gas on destination network for Teleportation

[wsdt]

Issue Type

[ ] bug report
[ x] feature request

Current Behavior

Disburser wallet covers fee for disbursement on destination network.

Expected Behavior

Right now we cover fees, potentially in future when we have sufficient usage we might want to consider adding a fee to cover those.

Some thoughts:

• We just keep covering the fees on the destination chain, for better UX.
• We either just estimate gas on the destination network before disbursing, calculate how many tokens equal that gas and just do not disburse those tokens or even potentially swap them to the native asset to reduce the risk even further (triggering a 2nd tx that needs to be covered by the user - or via multicall).
• Or we could just charge a "service fee" of x % of the bridged funds and even have a minor business case around teleportation since we also host the infra for it etc. e.g. not disbursing x% of tokens/native asset on the destination network to cover fees & potentially generate revenue. Especially considering that Teleportation isn't protected by reorgs right now, etc. as there are almost instant disbursements we could also consider that a minor risk fee as well for the UX we are providing.