Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for search based on Domain Architecture #73

Open
daviortega opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Support for search based on Domain Architecture #73

daviortega opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@daviortega
Copy link
Member

Why?

MiST2 used to have a search box to find proteins with a certain domain. It was a very useful tool and I think we should bring it to MiST3.

How (ideally)?

Approach 1

My first instinct is that we should make a POST route where the advanced users can post RechArch definition and a taxonomic context.

The route could filter the aseqs present in the taxonomy context and then compute the RegArch on them.

It might not be ideal to compute RegArch to ALL Aseqs every time. Thus, we could include a step in the pipeline and a new DB table to index the protein features and associate a list of aseq with it.

That would speed up the process of making a POST call with RegArch, since we could pre-process the request and only apply the RegArch to the subset of aseqs with domains that are part of the RegArch request.

UI

For the user using the GUI, we can keep it simple and only allow requests for the presence of a single domain within a genome or not. The GUI generates a simple RegArch and sends it on the POST route. The answer is rendered as a list of genes like the GUI does already.


These are half baked thoughts, but we should definitely discuss how to make this option available in MiST3.

It would be nice to get the opinion of @lukeulrich, @adebali and @ToshkaDev about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant